In a rare public statement, Chief Justice John Roberts rebuked Donald Trump over his call for the impeachment of District Judge James Boasberg. The move has further heightened the long-standing tensions between the former president and the judiciary.
Trump’s Call for Impeachment
Following Judge Boasberg’s order to suspend deportation flights of Venezuelan migrants, Trump took to Truth Social to label the judge a “Radical Left Lunatic” and called for his impeachment.
Trump’s frustration stems from Boasberg’s ruling, which challenged the White House’s use of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to justify the deportations. Despite claims that the migrants were gang members, no concrete evidence has been presented.
Chief Justice Roberts Responds
Justice Roberts responded with a firm reminder of the constitutional process.
“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision,” said Roberts.
He further emphasized that the appellate review process exists to address such disputes, not impeachment.
Escalating Political Tensions
Shortly after Trump’s remarks, Republican Representative Brandon Gill introduced articles of impeachment against Judge Boasberg. The move has drawn criticism from legal experts, who describe it as politically motivated.
Legal scholar Carl Tobias called Roberts’s response “extraordinary,” likening it to a previous rebuke from the Chief Justice in 2018, when Trump criticized federal judges.
In the Courts Under Duress
This latest argument underscores concerns about Trump’s ongoing attacks on the judiciary. Others are concerned that his comments might erode public confidence in the justice system even further.
Although it is uncommon to remove a federal judge from office (the last removal occurred in 2010), Boasberg’s attempt is indicative of escalating political hostility.
What Happens Next?
As the issue unfolds, everyone is watching to see if the court can resist political interference. Justice Roberts’ defense of judicial independence serves as a powerful reminder of the role that courts play in maintaining constitutional checks and balances.
Source: France 24